There are Moments When You Must Wait for Coffee---Just as People Wait for Justice
There are many interesting things to know about the Supreme
Court. Any good docent will tell you that it was built in 1935, when
Justice Taft insisted that the Supreme Court should have its own
building---after 146 years of residing
in various locations (including the Capital Building).
What is difficult to
capture in words, however, is the ineffable sense of majesty of this building.
The power of inclusive democracy, with all of its gravity and rigorous
discipline.
This is where Brown versus the Board of Education of Topeka
was argued in 1954---the case which would eventually officially desegregate
education, and change our lives forever. The karma of that decision and that
energy lives in that building. You feel it like a strong breeze when you walk
in, enter the front hall and see the portrait of Thurgood Marshall (the lawyer
who argued the case and later became the first African-American justice.) With
Chief Justice Warren at the helm, the court decided unanimously on May 17, 1954
that “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”
Architect Cass Gilbert designed the building in perfect
harmony with the surrounding landscape using a classical Corinthian
architectural style. It is the perfect setting for the serious judicial work
that goes on here---of the 10,000 cases requested each year, 80 are
heard. It is a great privilege to have a case heard at the Supreme Court.
While visiting Washington, D.C., we had the chance to visit
the Supreme Court---a short walk from our hotel. The day was temperate, but somewhat
sad, happening just two days after the bombing at the 2013 Boston Marathon. Cherry
blossoms bloomed all around us as we walked down Pennsylvania Avenue resolute
in our determination to stand in line so that we could attend an oral argument
in the Great Hall. (Court was in session!) We had not had anything to eat or
drink—including coffee. We were determined to get through security and hear the
arguments. Coffee and food had to wait.
I went through the morning elated, but without coffee. As I
sat in the Great Hall, my eyes filled with tears when I saw Justice
Ginsburg, Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan sitting next to their male
colleagues. The proceedings reflected that unique quality of judicial
forbearance and spirited innovative determination to find the truth of the
matter—based on principle, but willing to set precedent. All of this---and no
coffee!
So later, when we had finally sat through the arguments, we
went to the cafeteria, where we had a lovely lunch---including dark roast coffee.
It was a low-key and healthy lunch---rice bowls, coffee, yogurt, salad---and we
felt incredibly nourished intellectually and nutritionally.
The coffee was so invigorating that I literally felt as if I
could spend the day touring museums. We stayed at the court for another hour, watching
a film and hearing a lecture, and left feeling lucky to be Americans in 2013.
The takeaway on the coffee situation on the Federal Mall:
There is no Starbucks, but there is always coffee---and it’s often good.
Comments